Third aliyah
משפטים · Mishpatim · Exodus 22:4-22:26
Progress2%
Exodus 22:4
If a man cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall let his beast loose, and it feed in another man’s field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution.
What's bothering Rashi?
The verse says the beast fed 'in another man's field.' Could the phrase instead simply mean a different field of his own?
Look closely. What seems repeated, missing, out of order, or strange?